
2026-01-22
When they talk aboutpin insulator, many immediately imagine that same porcelain “mycelium” on old wooden poles in the countryside. And here lies the first pitfall - reducing all diversity to an outdated image. In fact, even a classic porcelain pin is not just a “stick with a skirt”, but is designed for mechanical strength, tracking resistance and work in a specific environment. Nowadays, of course, polymers are increasingly used, but they also have their own problems. I’ll try to sort it out based on what I saw and touched with my hands, and not just read in catalogs.
Previously, there wasn’t much choice - porcelain, and that’s it. It would seem simple and reliable. But as soon as you start installing or replacing on a large scale, you understand all the disadvantages. Weight, fragility during transportation and installation (how many times have I seen chips on the ribs due to careless tightening of the nuts!), difficulty in fastening to modern metal and reinforced concrete supports. And from the point of view of linear installation, they are difficult to carry.
The advent of polymer insulators, the same fiberglass pins coated with EPDM or silicone, became a salvation for installers. Lightweight, impact resistant. But this is where the main headache began. Cheap polymers with a poorly developed composite or protective shell formulation could become covered with a mesh of tracks within a couple of seasons and begin to “gather dust.” - lose hydrophobic properties, become overgrown with persistent contaminants. And this is a direct path to breakdown. Therefore, the choice of manufacturer has become critically important. You can’t just buy a “polymer pin”; you need to understand who made it and what technology was used.
By the way, I had an interesting experience with products from Shijiazhuang Hist Electric LLC (their website, if anything,histe-ru.com). We encountered them about five years ago, when we were looking for an alternative for one localization. They position themselves as a manufacturer of cable fittings, but their line also includes polymer insulators, including pin-type ones. The first thing I noticed was the design of the fastening unit. Not just a bolt glued into a rod, but mechanical compression with force control. This immediately reduced the risk of rotation in the field. The shell material is silicone. In our conditions (dust, temperature changes) they performed well and age predictably. But this, by the way, is a general comment on the importance of the design, and not an advertisement.
Everything seems simple: a pin, a flange for fastening, an insulating part. But here's the thing about attaching it to the traverse. If the mounting holes on the flange do not have the correct countersink or the markings are “off”, when tightening, local stresses can be created in the material. For porcelain, this is an almost guaranteed crack, which will not appear immediately, but at the first serious wind or ice. For a polymer, this is a possible starting point for the destruction of a fiberglass rod due to constant vibration.
Another practical point is protection from birds. It would seem like a small thing. But on some designs of pin insulators, especially old ones, a convenient platform for birds was formed. The consequences are not only pollution, but also short circuits due to bird droppings or the birds themselves. Modern designs often take this into account, making the upper part more “uncomfortable”. or by installing additional covers. But when choosing a finished product, they rarely look at this, and then suffer locally.
Installation at low temperatures is a separate issue for polymers. Instructions are often written for “indoor” use. conditions. What if you put it at -25°C? Some polymer shells become tanned and lose elasticity. Improper tightening in this condition can damage both the seal at the junction with the metal and the shell itself. You have to either heat, or wait, or initially select materials designed for this range. This is a detail that you can’t always provide for in an office.
Periodic inspection is not just a question of whether it’s worth it or not. Forpin insulatorthere are clear points of attention. The first is the condition of the surface. For porcelain: chips, glaze, cracks. For polymer: loss of gloss, matting, small cracks (crackers), peeling of the shell from the rod. Particular care should be taken to look at the area near the pin - at the base of the insulating skirt, where moisture and dirt accumulate and the maximum voltage gradient is created.
The second is checking the fastening. Has the nut become loose due to vibration? Has there been any backlash? For polymer insulators, it is critical to check that the insulating part does not rotate relative to the metal pin. This may be a sign of a broken internal connection.
Third, and often overlooked, is load thermal monitoring. A good tool for identifying hidden problems. Overheating at the point of contact on the pin or on the mounting flange indicates a poor connection and an increase in contact resistance. And this is not just an insulator problem, it is a fire risk. I have seen cases where everything is visually perfect, but on the thermogram there is a bright heating spot. Saved me from a potential shutdown.
The most common is an attempt to save money by buying a “similar” one. insulator in size, but from an unknown manufacturer. The dimensions are the same, but the electrical and mechanical characteristics are not. This is especially true for creepage distance and impulse strength. Place one on a line that runs through a salty area or in an industrial area - and expect problems in wet weather.
A mistake when replacing porcelain with polymer is failure to take into account changes in mechanical loads. Polymer is lighter, yes. But it may have a different rigidity, a different coefficient of thermal expansion. If you change individually on a line, and not in sections, distortion and additional mechanical stress may occur. It is better, of course, to replace entire spans or coordinate the replacement with the designer.
And more about “compatibility?”. It happens that newpin insulatordoes not fit into the old seat due to a different flange geometry or size of the mounting holes. In the field they begin to “finish with a file” or install non-standard gaskets. This is categorically unacceptable, since the calculated plane of contact and tightening is violated. You need to either look for an exact analogue, or change the entire fastening unit on the support, which, naturally, is more expensive and takes longer.
The trend is obvious - polymers will replace porcelain and glass, but not everywhere and not immediately. For particularly critical facilities or in conditions of strong radiation exposure (for example, near nuclear facilities), classical materials will last for a long time due to the predictability of aging. However, the development of composite materials is progressing rapidly. Shells with the function of self-healing minor damage, with built-in sensors for monitoring mechanical stress and partial discharges, are already appearing.
Another direction is unification and modularity. Not just a pin, but a system where you can change the insulating part without removing the entire assembly from the support. This would be a huge benefit for the service. Some manufacturers, including the mentioned Shijiazhuang Hist Electric LLC, already offer solutions in their catalogs that are close to this - pins with replaceable polymer heads or extendable skirts. True, this has not yet received mass distribution; the industry is too conservative.
In the end, the choicepin insulator- this is always a compromise between price, reliability, operating conditions and even the service culture in a particular network facility. It is stupid to blindly pursue new materials if there is no way to properly diagnose and maintain them. Sometimes good old porcelain is more reliable, but with correctly calculated and installed fittings. The main thing is to understand that you are not just buying hardware, but a key element for decades of reliable service, and there are no trifles in this matter.